1. Review changes to ICRA CEB Charter

III.1 and III.2 of the CEB Charter have been revised. The full charter is available here. The revised versions are below.

III. Appointment of CEB members.

III.1. The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) will be appointed according to the following three step process.

(i) The Steering Committee for Technical Programs (SCTP) serves as the nominating committee and identifies the best candidate for the EIC;

(ii) The EIC candidacy is approved by a committee of six consisting of the Associate Vice President of Conference Activities for the SCTP, the Vice President for Publication Activities and the Vice President for Technical Activities or their delegated Associate Vice Presidents, the EIC of the Transactions on Robotics, the EIC of Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, and the EIC of the Robotics and Automation Magazine.

(iii) The EIC is appointed by the President of IEEE RAS.

III.2. The Editors will be proposed by the EIC and will be appointed by the Steering Committee on Technical Programs (SCTP).

2. Proposal to "upgrade" ICRA CEB to RAS CEB

2.1. Expanding editorial board

Proposal for expanding the scope of the editorial board to CASE (starting 2010) and other conferences

  • The RAS Conference Editorial Board (RAS CEB) will comprise the Editorial Boards for ICRA, CASE, and other conferences when and if they adopt the Conference Editorial Board Model. All members of these Editorial Boards will be members of *the* RAS Conference Editorial Board.
  • Each conference will have an Editor-in-Chief chosen from the RAS CEB.
  • The RAS CEB Editor-in-Chief will serve as the ICRA CEB.
  • The RAS CEB will be responsible for formulating and enforcing all policies and mechanisms for obtaining high quality reviews for the respective conferences.
  • All RAS CEB Editors and EiCs will meet annually to review CEB policies and mechanisms.
  • The Chair of the RAS CEB will report to the SCTP.

2.2. Reviewing ICRA videos

[Antonio/Peter]

Should the CEB review ICRA videos?

3. Update on ICRA 09

[Antonio/Katsu]

4. Review of RAS-fully-sponsored conferences

Data on select conferences available at SCTP wiki site

See here for detailed information. See IEEE Xplore comparison.

Need to develop template/database for conferences to enable future review

Need to develop and institutionalize a mechanism for review

5. Review of RAS-partially-sponsored conferences

  • Should we have 2 SCTP members serve on steering committee of all co-sponsored conferences?

6. Conflict of Interest for CEB

See draft prepared by Alessandro, Antonio and Seth.

7. Should we revisit double-blind reviewing?

Is this something we should consider? Here is an interesting paper.

conferences/sctphome/092408mtg.txt · Last modified: 2011/05/22 13:28 (external edit)